All Issue

2019 Vol.9, Issue 4

December 2019. pp. 1-15
Abstract


References
1 

AASHTO, AASHTO Partnering Handbook 2nd edition. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 2018.

2 

Abudayyeh, O., Partnering: A Team Building Approach to Quality Construction Management. Journal of Management in Engineering, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1994), vol. 10, no. 6(26), pp. 50-62, 1994

10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1994)10:6(26)
3 

Bayliss, R., Cheung, S.-O., Suen, H., and Wong, S.-P., Effective Partnering Tools in Construction: A Case Study on MTRC TKE Contract 604 in Hong Kong. International Journal of Project Management, doi:10.1016/ S0263-7863(03)00069-3, vol. 22, pp. 253-263, 2004.

10.1016/S0263-7863(03)00069-3
4 

Brown, D. K., ODOT Partnering Handbook. Grand Rapids, OH: Ohio Department of Transportation. Retrieved from 2000, http://www.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/ConstructionMgt/Admin/Partnering/handbook.pdf, (May 4, 2019).

5 

Ellicott, M. and Grajek, K., Best Value Contracting Criteria. Cost Engineering, AACE, pp. 31-34, 1997.

6 

Ernzen, J., Murdough, G., and Drecksel, D., Partnering on a design-build project: Making the three-way love affair work. Ransportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1712, pp. 202-211, 2000.

10.3141/1712-24
7 

Federal Highway Adminstration, Federal Highway Adminstration. Retrieved from Special experimental projects no.14 - Alternative contracting (formerly innovative contracting): https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ programadmin/contracts/sep_a.cfm (May 14, 2019).

8 

FHWA. Design-Build Effectiveness Study. Retrieved from USDOT - Federal Highway Authority: January, 2006, https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/reports/designbuild/designbuild.htm, (July 21, 2018)

9 

FHWA. Construction Manager/ General Contractor, Retrieved from USDOT-Federal Highway Administration: 2017, https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/innovation/everydaycounts/edc-2/pdfs/edc_cm_gm.pdf, (July 20, 2018).

10 

FHWA. Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC), Retrieved from USDOT-Federal Highway Administration: (June 6, 2017), https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/contracts/acm/cmgc.cfm, (July 20, 2018).

11 

FHWA. Construction Program Guide: Construction Manager/General Contractor Project Delivery. Retrieved from U.S. Department of Transportation: Federal Highway Administration: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ construction/cqit/cm.cfm, (June 27, 2017).

12 

Gransberg, D. and Shane, J., Construction Manager-at-Risk Project Delivery for Highway Programs. Washington, D.C.: National Cooperative Highway Research Program, 2010.

10.17226/14350
13 

Gransberg, D. and Shane, J., Defining Best Value for Construction Manager/General Contractor Projects: The CMGC Learning Curve. Journal of Management in Engineering, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000275, vol. 31, no. 4, 2015.

10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000275
14 

Gransberg, D., Dillion, W., Reynolds, L., and Boyd, J., Quantitative Analysis of Partnered Project Performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, pp. 161-166, 1999.

10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:3(161)
15 

Hancher, D. and Haggard, R., In Search of Partnering Excellence. Austin, Tx: Construction Industry Institute, 1991.

16 

Hannon, J. and Zhang, F., A New Methodology for Partnering Transportation Projects. Advances in Human Factors, Sustainable Urban Planning and Infrastructure. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer, Cham, pp. 318-325, 2017.

10.1007/978-3-319-60450-3_31
17 

Kereri, J. O., A comparison of project party relationships in design-bid-build and design-build project delivery methods. Journal of Architecture, Engineering and Construction, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 26-32, 2017.

10.7492/IJAEC.2017.021
18 

Kereri, J. O. and Harper, C. M., Intangible attaributes of partnering: A case study analysis . Annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board (TRB). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, 2019.

19 

Minnesota Department of Transportation. Minnesota Department of Ttansportation. Retrieved from Hwy 43 Bridge: www.dot.state.mn.us/winonabridge/work-package5-costs.html, (July 19, 2019).

20 

Murdough, G., Drecksel, D., Sharp, G., and Ernzen, J., Performance in the Project Trailer: A Partnering Evaluation Tool. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1994, pp. 26-34, 2007.

10.3141/1994-04
21 

Opie, B., Webb, L., and Dudzik, D., Partnering Process Survey Report 2016. Phoenix: Arizona Department of Transportation. Retrieved , from 2016, https://www.azdot.gov/docs/default-source/partnering/partnering-process- survey-report-2016.pdf?sfvrsn=2, (July 28, 2018).

22 

Rogge, D., Griffith, D., and Hutchins, W., Improving the Effectiveness of Partnering. Salem, Oregon: Oregon Department of Transportation, 2002.

23 

Schierholz, J., Gransberg, D., and McMinimee, J., enefits and Challenges of Implementing Construction Manager/General Contractor Project Delivery: The View from the Field. Transportation Research Board 91st Annual Meeting. Washibgton, DC: The National Academics of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, pp. 50-62, 2012.

24 

Warne, T., Partnering for Success. New York, NY: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1994.

25 

West, N., Gransberg, D., and McMinimee, J., Effective Tools for Projects Delivered by Construction Manager-General Contractor Method. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2268, 2015.

10.3141/2268-05
Information
  • Publisher :Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국건설관리학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management
  • Journal Title(Ko) :None
  • Volume : 9
  • No :4
  • Pages :1-15
  • Received Date :2019. 01. 22
  • Revised Date :2019. 10. 07
  • Accepted Date : 2019. 11. 20
Journal Informaiton Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • crosscheck
  • open access
  • orcid
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • KISTI Current Status
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close